23 October 2024
Read More3 October 2024
Read More26 September 2024
Read MoreWe are a family of strong 800+ people including 470+ professionals working from 14 locations across India.
We have a rich heritage and enduring legacy which are pivotal in shaping trust, excellence, and unparalleled legal expertise, thus building a strong reputation and a trusted brand.
Read MoreWe started in 1985 in a single room set up by the two founders with no prior experience of working in a law firm. Both the founders had outstanding academic records and focused on their deep understanding of the law to form the foundation of the firm.
Integrity, Knowledge and Passion are the principles that resonate with every member of our LKS family and the work that we do. These values drive us to build a community of legally sound professionals and well-serviced clients.
Everything we have accomplished over the last four decades is a result of our unique way of thinking which is deeply influenced by our core values and principles that define us.
Read MoreWe and our professionals consistently garner appreciation for the quality of our services and the depth of our legal expertise. This consistent acknowledgment serves as a testament to our unwavering commitment to exceed expectations.
Recently the Gujarat High Court in the case Real Strips v. Union of India had an occasion to decide the nature of powers exercised by the Ministry of Finance in deciding the imposition of countervailing duty. The article in this issue of International Trade Amicus critically analyses the judgement of the High Court in the light of recent controversy surrounding the issue. The author analyses the issue on two metrics. Firstly, for the purposes of review provision in Section 9C of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975, what is the interpretation of the term ‘Order of determination’? and secondly, whether the presence of a provision for appeal in Section 9C against such order of determination would make the levy of duty by the Government a quasi-judicial act? Citing various case law, the author concludes that it can be argued that the function of Central Government to levy or revoke the AD duty / CVD is a legislative act pursuant to a quasi-judicial determination by the DGTR. He states that an authoritative ruling by the Supreme Court would be the most instrumental step towards resolution of the present discourse...
The article in this issue of International Trade Amicus briefly discusses the first anti-absorption investigation...
The article in this issue of International Trade Amicus discusses some of the relevant jurisprudence...
The article discusses the legal basis for these agreements and assesses their compatibility with the...
Get access to our latest newsletters, articles and events:
Scan the QR code to get in
touch with us