23 October 2024
Read More3 October 2024
Read More26 September 2024
Read MoreWe are a family of strong 800+ people including 470+ professionals working from 14 locations across India.
We have a rich heritage and enduring legacy which are pivotal in shaping trust, excellence, and unparalleled legal expertise, thus building a strong reputation and a trusted brand.
Read MoreWe started in 1985 in a single room set up by the two founders with no prior experience of working in a law firm. Both the founders had outstanding academic records and focused on their deep understanding of the law to form the foundation of the firm.
Integrity, Knowledge and Passion are the principles that resonate with every member of our LKS family and the work that we do. These values drive us to build a community of legally sound professionals and well-serviced clients.
Everything we have accomplished over the last four decades is a result of our unique way of thinking which is deeply influenced by our core values and principles that define us.
Read MoreWe and our professionals consistently garner appreciation for the quality of our services and the depth of our legal expertise. This consistent acknowledgment serves as a testament to our unwavering commitment to exceed expectations.
The retrospective amendments proposed by the Finance Bill, 2023 to Section 9C and other related provisions of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 have tried to resolve the dispute regarding powers of the CESTAT to entertain appeals against the Ministry of Finance’s refusal to impose the trade remedy measures despite receiving positive recommendations from the DGTR. The article in this issue of International Trade Amicus traces the background of the issue, the previous jurisprudence thereon, the recent amendments proposed, and concludes with some comments for the readers. The authors opine that if the amendments have their intended effect, the domestic industry in India will not have a statutory appeal remedy against the MoF’s decisions not to impose the measures despite going through the full rigors of the investigation process before the DGTR. However, it is possible that such decisions can still be questioned before the constitutional courts under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. They also raise few pertinent questions which according to them have been left unanswered, and state that the precedents on the issue and the wordings of amendment could also give rise to further litigation.
The article in this issue of International Trade Amicus briefly discusses the first anti-absorption investigation...
The article in this issue of International Trade Amicus discusses some of the relevant jurisprudence...
The article discusses the legal basis for these agreements and assesses their compatibility with the...
Get access to our latest newsletters, articles and events:
Scan the QR code to get in
touch with us