23 October 2024
Read More3 October 2024
Read More26 September 2024
Read MoreWe are a family of strong 800+ people including 470+ professionals working from 14 locations across India.
We have a rich heritage and enduring legacy which are pivotal in shaping trust, excellence, and unparalleled legal expertise, thus building a strong reputation and a trusted brand.
Read MoreWe started in 1985 in a single room set up by the two founders with no prior experience of working in a law firm. Both the founders had outstanding academic records and focused on their deep understanding of the law to form the foundation of the firm.
Integrity, Knowledge and Passion are the principles that resonate with every member of our LKS family and the work that we do. These values drive us to build a community of legally sound professionals and well-serviced clients.
Everything we have accomplished over the last four decades is a result of our unique way of thinking which is deeply influenced by our core values and principles that define us.
Read MoreWe and our professionals consistently garner appreciation for the quality of our services and the depth of our legal expertise. This consistent acknowledgment serves as a testament to our unwavering commitment to exceed expectations.
The article in this issue of International Trade Amicus examines the recent Final Findings issued by the DGTR in the Mid-Term Review of countervailing duty on imports of Welded Stainless-Steel Pipes and Tubes (‘product under consideration’, ‘PUC’) from China PR and Vietnam. The author elaborately discusses the three reasons as listed by the DGTR while rejecting exclusion of specific grades of the PUC compliant with American Society of Mechanical Engineers-Bioprocessing Equipment (ASME-BPE) standards. According to the author, the findings provide certain ways in which the requirement of exclusion can be proved i.e., by establishing the technical differences, or showing legal requirements or showing that the user industry is only using a specific item and not the others. The author notes that by holding that the price difference, however significant, could not be the reason for product exclusions, the Authority has correctly emphasized on the need for evidence to substantiate differences on the basis of technical and physical characteristics. He also notes that the Authority’s findings in this MTR are also important as they highlight the importance of user participation in trade remedial proceedings...
The article in this issue of International Trade Amicus briefly discusses the first anti-absorption investigation...
The article in this issue of International Trade Amicus discusses some of the relevant jurisprudence...
The article discusses the legal basis for these agreements and assesses their compatibility with the...
Get access to our latest newsletters, articles and events:
Scan the QR code to get in
touch with us