23 October 2024
Read More3 October 2024
Read More26 September 2024
Read MoreWe are a family of strong 800+ people including 470+ professionals working from 14 locations across India.
We have a rich heritage and enduring legacy which are pivotal in shaping trust, excellence, and unparalleled legal expertise, thus building a strong reputation and a trusted brand.
Read MoreWe started in 1985 in a single room set up by the two founders with no prior experience of working in a law firm. Both the founders had outstanding academic records and focused on their deep understanding of the law to form the foundation of the firm.
Integrity, Knowledge and Passion are the principles that resonate with every member of our LKS family and the work that we do. These values drive us to build a community of legally sound professionals and well-serviced clients.
Everything we have accomplished over the last four decades is a result of our unique way of thinking which is deeply influenced by our core values and principles that define us.
Read MoreWe and our professionals consistently garner appreciation for the quality of our services and the depth of our legal expertise. This consistent acknowledgment serves as a testament to our unwavering commitment to exceed expectations.
The WTO Panel has recently held that USA’s additional duties of 25% ad valorem on imports of steel products and 10% ad valorem on imports of aluminium products are inconsistent with various provisions of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (‘GATT’), most notably the security exception in Article XXI. The article in this issue of International Trade Amicus discusses the panel’s key findings concerning the consistency of the US’ measures with GATT Article XXI which enables a WTO Member to take measures which are necessary for the protection of its essential security interests taken in time of war or other emergency in international relations. The article in this regard elaborately analyses the justiciability of measures taken pursuant to the security clause and the validity of the US measures. The author also highlights that though the US Trade Representative has already put out a bold statement unequivocally expressing its intention to not comply with the findings of the panel report, WTO Members may find relief in the fact that the panel has outrightly held these infamous measures as inconsistent with WTO law…
The article in this issue of International Trade Amicus briefly discusses the first anti-absorption investigation...
The article in this issue of International Trade Amicus discusses some of the relevant jurisprudence...
The article discusses the legal basis for these agreements and assesses their compatibility with the...
Get access to our latest newsletters, articles and events:
Scan the QR code to get in
touch with us