23 October 2024
Read More3 October 2024
Read More26 September 2024
Read More17 October 2024
Read More14 October 2024
Read More10 October 2024
Read MoreWe are a family of strong 800+ people including 480+ professionals working from 14 locations across India.
We have a rich heritage and enduring legacy which are pivotal in shaping trust, excellence, and unparalleled legal expertise, thus building a strong reputation and a trusted brand.
Read MoreWe started in 1985 in a single room set up by the two founders with no prior experience of working in a law firm. Both the founders had outstanding academic records and focused on their deep understanding of the law to form the foundation of the firm.
Integrity, Knowledge and Passion are the principles that resonate with every member of our LKS family and the work that we do. These values drive us to build a community of legally sound professionals and well-serviced clients.
Everything we have accomplished over the last four decades is a result of our unique way of thinking which is deeply influenced by our core values and principles that define us.
Read MoreWe and our professionals consistently garner appreciation for the quality of our services and the depth of our legal expertise. This consistent acknowledgment serves as a testament to our unwavering commitment to exceed expectations.
The article analyses the recent decision of the CESTAT which has allowed an appeal against the Finance Ministry’s decision rejecting the Designated Authority’s recommendation to impose anti-dumping duty. The Tribunal determined that the Office Memorandum (‘OM’) of the Ministry of Finance was an ‘order of determination regarding the existence, degree and effect of dumping’ and that the function performed by the Central Government under Section 9A of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 is quasi-judicial in nature. It thus held that such OM should spell out reasons for not imposing anti-dumping duty. Observing that it would be in the interests of transparency if the Finance Ministry records the reasons in the OMs, the author asks as to whether mention of mere ‘public interest’ is a sufficient reason to stand the scrutiny of the Courts. The author also explores the answer to the question whether since the DGTR has already made its determination regarding the existence, degree and effect of dumping vide the final findings, can the Finance Ministry make any such determination. Further, can the issuance of a customs notification by the Central Government imposing ADD be called a quasi-judicial act?...
The article in this issue of International Trade Amicus briefly discusses the first anti-absorption investigation...
The article in this issue of International Trade Amicus discusses some of the relevant jurisprudence...
The article discusses the legal basis for these agreements and assesses their compatibility with the...
Get access to our latest newsletters, articles and events:
Scan the QR code to get in
touch with us