We are a family of strong 800+ people including 470+ professionals working from 14 locations across India.
We have a rich heritage and enduring legacy which are pivotal in shaping trust, excellence, and unparalleled legal expertise, thus building a strong reputation and a trusted brand.
We started in 1985 in a single room set up by the two founders with no prior experience of working in a law firm. Both the founders had outstanding academic records and focused on their deep understanding of the law to form the foundation of the firm.
Integrity, Knowledge and Passion are the principles that resonate with every member of our LKS family and the work that we do. These values drive us to build a community of legally sound professionals and well-serviced clients.
Everything we have accomplished over the last four decades is a result of our unique way of thinking which is deeply influenced by our core values and principles that define us.
We and our professionals consistently garner appreciation for the quality of our services and the depth of our legal expertise. This consistent acknowledgment serves as a testament to our unwavering commitment to exceed expectations.
The article in this issue of Tax Amicus revolves around the recommendation of the 50th Meeting of the GST Council and the clarification brought in by the CBIC Circular No. 199/2023-GST, dated 17 August 2023 with respect to distribution of credit through Input Service Distributor (‘ISD’). The article in this regard notes that ISD vs. Cross Charge issue has been an area of ambiguity both for the taxman and the taxpayer since the inception of GST, as different practices have been prevalent in the industry. Noting that the Circular has put at rest many disputes surrounding the issue, the authors highlight some of the open issues and aspects which need to be addressed in view of the proposed amendment in law to make the ISD registration mandatory. They, in this regard, discuss the issues like valuation in case of cross-charge, issues when recipient unit is in SEZ, and the ambiguity regarding the costs which need to be included for the purpose of cross charge of internally generated services. According to them, before making ISD mandatory, it is important that government brings clarification.
Goods and Services Tax (GST)
Notifications and Circulars
Online gaming – CGST (Amendment) Bill, 2023 and IGST (Amendment) Bill, 2023 granted assent by the President
Central Goods and Services Tax Rules, 2017 amended for second time in 2023
Amendments in CGST Act and IGST Act by Finance Acts, 2021 and 2023 notified
Ratio decidendi
Cash not forming part of stock-in-trade of business cannot be seized during investigation aimed at detecting GST evasion – SC approves Kerala HC decision – Delhi HC also holds that Section 67 is not to seize assets, which are not subject matter of evasion, for recovering tax
Registration – Show cause notice to be not merely uploaded on web-portal but also forwarded by email or hand delivered – Bombay High Court
Cancellation of registration – Delay in filing appeal thereagainst to be condoned – Madras High Court
Input Tax Credit is not available if seller not paid tax to government – Patna High Court
ITC reversal when not to be asked from the buyer in case the seller had not paid tax – Calcutta High Court
Provisional blocking of ITC under CGST Rule 86A – Post-decisional hearing to be granted – Karnataka High Court
Confiscation of goods of the buyer, in case of doubtful existence of the seller, when not sustainable – Andhra Pradesh
Retrospective cancellation of registration when not sustainable – Delhi High Court
Natural justice – Telephonic conversation is no substitute for personal hearing – Delhi High Court
Loan to a credit card holder – IGST when not chargeable on interest – Calcutta High Court
Demand – Notice under Section 61(3) is not mandatory for proceeding under Section 74 – Allahabad High Court
Amount deposited under Section 73(5) to be accepted towards fulfillment of pre-deposit under Section 107(6) – Bombay High Court
Cancellation of registration by succeeding officer – Succeeding officer to also issue notice – Kerala High Court
Amount paid during investigation is not paid under self-assessment even if paid in Form DRC-03 – Punjab & Haryana High Court
Advisory to foreign group company for investment in India does not fall under intermediary services – Delhi High Court
Credit note is not required to accompany return of goods – Madras High Court
Training for appearing in an examination is not exempt, even though a course completion certificate provided – Uttar Pradesh Appellate AAR
Restaurant service – ITC reversal required in respect of sale of alcoholic liquor – West Bengal Appellate AAR
Customs
Notifications and Circulars
Onions – Export duty @ 40% imposed
Rice, parboiled – Export duty @ 20% imposed till 15 October 2023
De-oiled rice bran under ITC (HS) Code 2306 prohibited for export
Laptops, tablets, all-in-one personal computers, and ultra small form factor computers and servers – Import clearances to require licence for restricted imports from 1 November 2023
Rice – Export policy of non-basmati white rice clarified
Ratio decidendi
No interest and penalty against demand of Additional Customs duty and Special Additional Duty – Supreme Court affirms Bombay High Court decision
Time period for adjudication of SCN under Section 28(9) – Words ‘where it is possible to do so’ do not allow Department to defer adjudication for indeterminate period – Delhi High Court
Exemption benefit can be claimed post amendment and re-assessment of Bill of Entry – CESTAT Ahmedabad
Vehicle cannot be confiscated for possibility of future use as means of transport of smuggled goods – Kerala High Court
Power to search premises under Customs Section 105 does not mean power to seal it – Bombay High Court
Snow goggles are not classifiable as sunglasses – No confiscation for classifying goods under a Heading different from what opined by Department – CESTAT New Delhi
Lawn mower is classifiable under Heading 8433 and not under Heading 8467 – CESTAT Chennai
Roasted areca nut is classifiable under Customs Heading 2008 and not Heading 0802 – Madras High Court
Different thresholds of Bank Guarantee cannot be fixed when the issues/facts are identical – CESTAT Ahmedabad
Central Excise, Service Tax & VAT
Ratio decidendi
Intravenous fluids – Exemption – Composition of product important – Addition of chemicals which do not alter character of product is immaterial – Supreme Court
Flue gas generated during manufacture of metallurgical coke is not a manufactured product – CESTAT Kolkata
Parking – Building used for parking is excluded from Renting of Immovable Property service – CESTAT Chennai
Mere raising of ‘debit notes’ on sister concern does not make assessee liable to service tax under Management Consultancy services – CESTAT Kolkata
Cenvat credit available on service fees paid for development of Part Manual and Maintenance, Repair and Construction Manual – CESTAT Allahabad
Savoury Oats/Silk Oats are classifiable under TI 1104 12 00 and not under TI 1904 20 00 – No change in essential character of oats even after mixing with dehydrated vegetables – CESTAT Chennai