23 October 2024
Read More3 October 2024
Read More26 September 2024
Read MoreWe are a family of strong 800+ people including 470+ professionals working from 14 locations across India.
We have a rich heritage and enduring legacy which are pivotal in shaping trust, excellence, and unparalleled legal expertise, thus building a strong reputation and a trusted brand.
Read MoreWe started in 1985 in a single room set up by the two founders with no prior experience of working in a law firm. Both the founders had outstanding academic records and focused on their deep understanding of the law to form the foundation of the firm.
Integrity, Knowledge and Passion are the principles that resonate with every member of our LKS family and the work that we do. These values drive us to build a community of legally sound professionals and well-serviced clients.
Everything we have accomplished over the last four decades is a result of our unique way of thinking which is deeply influenced by our core values and principles that define us.
Read MoreWe and our professionals consistently garner appreciation for the quality of our services and the depth of our legal expertise. This consistent acknowledgment serves as a testament to our unwavering commitment to exceed expectations.
The first article in this issue of Tax Amicus discusses at length the issue as to whether an intermediary suppling service to a foreign customer should discharge CGST+SGST or IGST. It notes that Section 8(2) of the Integrated Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 dealing with ‘intra-State supply’ begins with the term ‘subject to…’ thereby giving a meaning that Section 8 is inextricably conditional upon Section 12 and does not have its own identity unless the later section is invoked. The authors are of the view that hence in such case, the transaction would be covered under Section 13(8)(c) and be deemed as inter-State supply as per Section 7(5)(c). They also state that the Gujarat High Court’s observation in the case of Material Recycling Association of India, that CGST+SGST would be liable in such case, is a mere obiter dicta. The article concludes by observing that while the legacy issue of sales agent vs. intermediary is still continuing on one hand, it is high time for CBIC to clarify the nature of applicable tax...
The second article in this issue of the newsletter elaborately discusses the thin line which a payment needs to cross in order to become a consideration. Discussing the definitions of ‘consideration’ under GST law and Indian Contract Act, 1872, the article states that payment should have a direct and sufficient nexus with the supply and be at the desire of the promisor. Providing illustrations, the author comments that merely because some payment is made by one party to another, it does not necessarily imply that there would be some supply for which the payment is a consideration. Regarding the second attribute of the payment being at the desire of the promisor, the author, relying upon recent CESTAT Larger Bench decision in the case of Repco Home Finance Ltd., also points out various instances where the payment cannot be a consideration. According to the author, it should be determined for each payment whether there is any corresponding activity and whether the payment has the attributes of consideration...
Goods and Services Tax (GST) Notifications and Circulars • 54th Meeting of GST Council – Highlights of important...
Goods and Services Tax (GST) Notifications and Circulars • Distribution of credit by Input Service Distributor will be...
The article in this issue of Indirect Tax Amicus attempts to explore the ramifications of...
Get access to our latest newsletters, articles and events:
Scan the QR code to get in
touch with us