23 October 2024
Read More3 October 2024
Read More26 September 2024
Read MoreWe are a family of strong 800+ people including 470+ professionals working from 14 locations across India.
We have a rich heritage and enduring legacy which are pivotal in shaping trust, excellence, and unparalleled legal expertise, thus building a strong reputation and a trusted brand.
Read MoreWe started in 1985 in a single room set up by the two founders with no prior experience of working in a law firm. Both the founders had outstanding academic records and focused on their deep understanding of the law to form the foundation of the firm.
Integrity, Knowledge and Passion are the principles that resonate with every member of our LKS family and the work that we do. These values drive us to build a community of legally sound professionals and well-serviced clients.
Everything we have accomplished over the last four decades is a result of our unique way of thinking which is deeply influenced by our core values and principles that define us.
Read MoreWe and our professionals consistently garner appreciation for the quality of our services and the depth of our legal expertise. This consistent acknowledgment serves as a testament to our unwavering commitment to exceed expectations.
6 January 2023
In an interesting case involving intersection of insolvency laws with a tax settlement scheme, the Supreme Court of India has on 5 January 2023 allowed assessee’s appeal against the High Court decision dismissing assessee’s writ petition which had sought direction to the Revenue department for consideration of the case of the assessee under the Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019 (‘Scheme’).
The High Court had declined to interfere in the dispute where the settlement amount under the Scheme could not be paid by the assessee before 30 June 2020 (last date for such payment) due to the legal moratorium imposed upon the company under the provisions of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (‘IBC’).
Allowing the appeal in Shekhar Resorts Limited v. Union of India, the Apex Court observed that it was not disputed that the assessee was entitled to the benefit of the settlement under the Scheme and that there was statutory disability on the part of the appellant in making the payment during the moratorium. The Court also observed that if the assessee had made any payment during the period of moratorium, it would have committed breach of the provisions of the IBC.
The Supreme Court in this regard noted that according to various precedents, no party shall be left remediless, and no law would compel a person to do the impossible. It was hence of the view that the assessee could not be punished for not doing something which was impossible for it to do.
The Apex Court though concurred with the views of the High Court that a High Court cannot, in exercise of powers under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, extend the period under the Scheme, 2019, it was of the view that it is not a case of extension of the Scheme but a case of taking remedial measures.
Another ground as taken by the High Court while dismissing the petition, that the Designated Committees are not in existence after the stipulated date, was also rejected by the Supreme Court. The Court in this regard noted that CBIC has issued a circular that in a case where the High Court have passed an order setting aside the rejection of the claim under the Scheme after 30 June 2020, the applications can be processed manually. It also noted that in many cases the High Courts have remanded the matter to the Designated Committees which consist of the officers of the Department and the applications thereafter are processed manually.
The Revenue department was thus directed to appropriate the amount towards settlement dues under the Scheme and issue a discharge certificate to the assessee.