23 October 2024
Read More3 October 2024
Read More26 September 2024
Read MoreWe are a family of strong 800+ people including 470+ professionals working from 14 locations across India.
We have a rich heritage and enduring legacy which are pivotal in shaping trust, excellence, and unparalleled legal expertise, thus building a strong reputation and a trusted brand.
Read MoreWe started in 1985 in a single room set up by the two founders with no prior experience of working in a law firm. Both the founders had outstanding academic records and focused on their deep understanding of the law to form the foundation of the firm.
Integrity, Knowledge and Passion are the principles that resonate with every member of our LKS family and the work that we do. These values drive us to build a community of legally sound professionals and well-serviced clients.
Everything we have accomplished over the last four decades is a result of our unique way of thinking which is deeply influenced by our core values and principles that define us.
Read MoreWe and our professionals consistently garner appreciation for the quality of our services and the depth of our legal expertise. This consistent acknowledgment serves as a testament to our unwavering commitment to exceed expectations.
1 February 2024
In a case where the GST amount was paid in the Electronic Cash Ledger (ECL) by generating GST PMT-06 before the due date, though the GSTR-3B return was filed belatedly, the Madras High Court has rejected the contention of the Department that the deposit of tax in ECL would not amount to payment of tax and would attract interest liability.
The High Court in Eicher Motors Limited v. Superintendent of GST and Central Excise was of the view that it is not correct to state that the instance of payment of tax to the Government would occur only upon the filing of GSTR-3B return and thereafter by debiting the ECL or electronic credit ledger. According to the Court, from the moment the amount is deposited by generating GST PMT-06, it is the money of the exchequers, since the money was collected only under the name of the exchequer in the form of GST.
The Court noted that once the amount is paid by GST PMT-06, the said amount will be initially credited to the account of the Government immediately and the tax liability of a registered person will be discharged to that extent, and that it is only thereafter, for the purpose of accounting only, it will be deemed to be credited to the ECL, as stated in Explanation (a) to Section 49(11) of the CGST Act.
Considering provisions of Sections 39(1), 39(7) and Explanation (a) to Section 49(11) along with Form GST PMT-06, Form GSTR-3 and Form GSTR-3B, the Court noted that payment of tax will always be made not later than the last date for filing the GSTR-3 or GSTR-3B monthly returns.
The Court also held that the submission of the Department that no tax amount will be passed on to the Government until filing of GSTR-3B would be contrary to Section 54(12) read with 39(7).
Allowing the writ petitions, the Madras High Court differed with the views of the Jharkhand High Court’s decision in RSB Transmission (India) Ltd. v. Union of India and the Telangana High Court decision in Megha Engineering and Infrastructures Limited v. CCT.
Assessee in this case was represented by Lakshmikumaran & Sridharan.