23 October 2024
Read More3 October 2024
Read More26 September 2024
Read MoreWe are a family of strong 800+ people including 470+ professionals working from 14 locations across India.
We have a rich heritage and enduring legacy which are pivotal in shaping trust, excellence, and unparalleled legal expertise, thus building a strong reputation and a trusted brand.
Read MoreWe started in 1985 in a single room set up by the two founders with no prior experience of working in a law firm. Both the founders had outstanding academic records and focused on their deep understanding of the law to form the foundation of the firm.
Integrity, Knowledge and Passion are the principles that resonate with every member of our LKS family and the work that we do. These values drive us to build a community of legally sound professionals and well-serviced clients.
Everything we have accomplished over the last four decades is a result of our unique way of thinking which is deeply influenced by our core values and principles that define us.
Read MoreWe and our professionals consistently garner appreciation for the quality of our services and the depth of our legal expertise. This consistent acknowledgment serves as a testament to our unwavering commitment to exceed expectations.
18 May 2021
The Securities Appellate Tribunal has held that mere ‘forwarded as received’ WhatsApp message circulated on a group regarding quarterly financial results of a Company, closely matching with the vital statistics, some time before the publication of the same, not amounts to an unpublished price sensitive information (‘UPSI’) under SEBI (Prohibition of Insider Trading) Regulations, 2015.
The Tribunal noted that SEBI could not find out that the source of information was from the side of financial team, legal team or the audit team of the respective companies and that AO did not appreciate that the messages might have originated from the brokerage houses, or from the estimates found on the platform of Bloomberg which were floated and were in the public domain.
It also noted that there were numerous other messages of similar nature received and forwarded by the appellant which did not at all match with the published financial results.
Allowing the appeal, the SAT in Shruti Vora v. SEBI [Order dated 22 March 2021] observed that the SEBI failed to prove any preponderance of probabilities that the impugned messages were UPSI, that the appellants knew that it was UPSI and with the said knowledge they or any of them had passed the said information to other parties.