23 October 2024
Read More3 October 2024
Read More26 September 2024
Read MoreWe are a family of strong 800+ people including 470+ professionals working from 14 locations across India.
We have a rich heritage and enduring legacy which are pivotal in shaping trust, excellence, and unparalleled legal expertise, thus building a strong reputation and a trusted brand.
Read MoreWe started in 1985 in a single room set up by the two founders with no prior experience of working in a law firm. Both the founders had outstanding academic records and focused on their deep understanding of the law to form the foundation of the firm.
Integrity, Knowledge and Passion are the principles that resonate with every member of our LKS family and the work that we do. These values drive us to build a community of legally sound professionals and well-serviced clients.
Everything we have accomplished over the last four decades is a result of our unique way of thinking which is deeply influenced by our core values and principles that define us.
Read MoreWe and our professionals consistently garner appreciation for the quality of our services and the depth of our legal expertise. This consistent acknowledgment serves as a testament to our unwavering commitment to exceed expectations.
5 June 2021
The Supreme Court in a recent judgment has held that the Notification dated 15 November 2019 (‘Notification’), which notified the Insolvency and Bankruptcy (Application to Adjudicating Authority for Insolvency Resolution Process for Personal Guarantors to Corporate Debtors) Rules, 2019 (Rules), is ‘legal and valid’.
The said Notification was challenged before several High Courts and therefore, the Supreme Court had directed transfer of petitions from High Courts to itself to provide uniform interpretation on the said Notification and the Rules.
The Petitioners inter alia contended that the said Notification which brought into force Section 2(e) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, thus making the Code applicable to ‘personal guarantor to corporate debtor’, was ultra vires as it selectively made the provisions of the Code applicable to a specific category of persons.
Rejecting the said contention, the Supreme Court was of the view that the Central Government has followed a stage-by-stage mechanism to bring in force various provisions of the Code depending upon the priorities and with an aim to fulfil the objectives of the Code.
The Supreme Court in the case Lalit Kumar Jain v. Union of India observed that the Central Government had consulted the body of experts which recommended that personal guarantors to corporate debtors facing insolvency process should also be involved in proceedings by the same adjudicator and for this, necessary amendments were required.
It held that therefore, the issuance of the impugned notification was well within the powers conferred by the Parliament under Section 1(3) of the Code.