23 October 2024
Read More3 October 2024
Read More26 September 2024
Read MoreWe are a family of strong 800+ people including 470+ professionals working from 14 locations across India.
We have a rich heritage and enduring legacy which are pivotal in shaping trust, excellence, and unparalleled legal expertise, thus building a strong reputation and a trusted brand.
Read MoreWe started in 1985 in a single room set up by the two founders with no prior experience of working in a law firm. Both the founders had outstanding academic records and focused on their deep understanding of the law to form the foundation of the firm.
Integrity, Knowledge and Passion are the principles that resonate with every member of our LKS family and the work that we do. These values drive us to build a community of legally sound professionals and well-serviced clients.
Everything we have accomplished over the last four decades is a result of our unique way of thinking which is deeply influenced by our core values and principles that define us.
Read MoreWe and our professionals consistently garner appreciation for the quality of our services and the depth of our legal expertise. This consistent acknowledgment serves as a testament to our unwavering commitment to exceed expectations.
13 December 2021
The Madras High Court has held that assignee of the copyright is not legally permitted to issue or grant license under the Copyright Act, 1957 without being a copyright society under the said Act as contemplated under its Section 33.
Deliberating on the difference between the first and second proviso to Section 33(1), the Court held that the business of granting or issuing licenses in respect of any work in which the copyright subsists, can be undertaken only through a copyright society registered under Section 33(3).
The High Court was of the view that the right of an owner, in his individual capacity, to exploit a right by issuing a license remains untouched. However, in case of ‘business’ i.e., a commercial enterprise of issuing licenses, the law required it to be routed ‘only’ through a registered copyright society.
The Court in its Judgement dated 8 December 2021 also considered the background of the amendment made in the Copyright Act in 2012 which was to ensure that the business of issuing licenses in copyrights were routed only through copyright societies so that the royalties could be shared between the authors and composers and the owners of the copyright.
Reliance was also placed, in this regard, on statement of the Minister of Information and Broadcasting made on the floor of the Parliament while introducing the amendments to the Copyright Act in 2012.
Plaintiff’s contention that by virtue of the assignment agreements executed in their favour by the owners of copyright, they have become the absolute owner of the copyright and has the right to issue licenses to any person, was thus not agreed with by the Court.
According to the Court, Section 30 merely recognises the right of the owner to grant a license and does not make a distinction between individuals and business entities, a distinction which is at the heart of Section 33.
Allowing the preliminary objections by the defendant, the Court in Novex Communications Pvt. Ltd. v. DXC Technology Pvt. Ltd. also dismissed the suit and directed the plaintiff to pay costs to the defendants.