23 October 2024
Read More3 October 2024
Read More26 September 2024
Read More17 October 2024
Read More14 October 2024
Read More10 October 2024
Read MoreWe are a family of strong 800+ people including 470+ professionals working from 14 locations across India.
We have a rich heritage and enduring legacy which are pivotal in shaping trust, excellence, and unparalleled legal expertise, thus building a strong reputation and a trusted brand.
Read MoreWe started in 1985 in a single room set up by the two founders with no prior experience of working in a law firm. Both the founders had outstanding academic records and focused on their deep understanding of the law to form the foundation of the firm.
Integrity, Knowledge and Passion are the principles that resonate with every member of our LKS family and the work that we do. These values drive us to build a community of legally sound professionals and well-serviced clients.
Everything we have accomplished over the last four decades is a result of our unique way of thinking which is deeply influenced by our core values and principles that define us.
Read MoreWe and our professionals consistently garner appreciation for the quality of our services and the depth of our legal expertise. This consistent acknowledgment serves as a testament to our unwavering commitment to exceed expectations.
30 May 2022
Allowing an appeal against the decision of the Delhi High Court, the Supreme Court has held that the offense of copyright infringement under Section 63 the Copyright Act, 1957 is a cognizable and non-bailable offence.
Taking note of Part II of the First Schedule to the Criminal Procedure Code, the Supreme Court observed that if the offense is punishable with imprisonment for three years and onwards till seven years, the offense is cognizable.
The Apex Court in this regard observed that the maximum punishment which can be imposed under Section 63 was three years and thus, the Magistrate may sentence the accused for three years also.
The Supreme Court in this case - Knit Pro International v. State of NCT of Delhi, held that only in a case where the offense is punishable by imprisonment for less than three years or with a fine only, the offense can be said to be non-cognizable.
The Court in its Judgement dated 20 May 2022 also observed that the language of the provision in Part II of the First Schedule to CrPC is very clear and there is no ambiguity whatsoever. Court’s decision in the case of Rakesh Kumar Paul v. State of Assam [(2017) 15 SCC 67] was held as not applicable.