23 October 2024
Read More3 October 2024
Read More26 September 2024
Read MoreWe are a family of strong 800+ people including 470+ professionals working from 14 locations across India.
We have a rich heritage and enduring legacy which are pivotal in shaping trust, excellence, and unparalleled legal expertise, thus building a strong reputation and a trusted brand.
Read MoreWe started in 1985 in a single room set up by the two founders with no prior experience of working in a law firm. Both the founders had outstanding academic records and focused on their deep understanding of the law to form the foundation of the firm.
Integrity, Knowledge and Passion are the principles that resonate with every member of our LKS family and the work that we do. These values drive us to build a community of legally sound professionals and well-serviced clients.
Everything we have accomplished over the last four decades is a result of our unique way of thinking which is deeply influenced by our core values and principles that define us.
Read MoreWe and our professionals consistently garner appreciation for the quality of our services and the depth of our legal expertise. This consistent acknowledgment serves as a testament to our unwavering commitment to exceed expectations.
Virtual Webinar
The Supreme Court in a recent landmark judgement has held that DRI officer is not ‘the proper officer’ to issue show cause notices under Section 28(4) of the Customs Act, 1962. The genesis of the dispute was an investigation initiated by the DRI in 2013 which culminated into a show cause notice in August 2014, covering imports made between 2012-2014.
17 Mar 2021 | 4:30 PM - 6:00 PM
This full bench judgment of the Supreme Court will not only have implications on show cause notices issued by DRI officers, but also on all instances of litigation whose genesis is a show cause notice issued by a different investigative agency/department of the Indian Government.
Lakshmikumaran & Sridharan (L&S) is pleased to organise a webinar to discuss the far-reaching implications of this judgment of the Supreme Court.