23 October 2024
Read More3 October 2024
Read More26 September 2024
Read MoreWe are a family of strong 800+ people including 470+ professionals working from 14 locations across India.
We have a rich heritage and enduring legacy which are pivotal in shaping trust, excellence, and unparalleled legal expertise, thus building a strong reputation and a trusted brand.
Read MoreWe started in 1985 in a single room set up by the two founders with no prior experience of working in a law firm. Both the founders had outstanding academic records and focused on their deep understanding of the law to form the foundation of the firm.
Integrity, Knowledge and Passion are the principles that resonate with every member of our LKS family and the work that we do. These values drive us to build a community of legally sound professionals and well-serviced clients.
Everything we have accomplished over the last four decades is a result of our unique way of thinking which is deeply influenced by our core values and principles that define us.
Read MoreWe and our professionals consistently garner appreciation for the quality of our services and the depth of our legal expertise. This consistent acknowledgment serves as a testament to our unwavering commitment to exceed expectations.
Electricity was always intended to be kept outside the scope of GST. However, recently the sector is facing various disputes from the department alleging huge GST liability on various transaction such as open-access charges levied by electricity transmission or distribution utility (TRANSCOs/DISCOMs) for transmission or distribution of electricity, deposit work undertaken by DISCOMs on the request of customer for distribution of electricity, capacity charges levied by Generating Companies for sale of electricity and charges levied by Load Despatch Centre for transmission of electricity, etc.
The present article attempts to discuss the dispute on the scope of distribution of electricity services by DISCOMs. The issue was ignited in GST when CBIC issued a circular in the month of March 2018 stating that specified services provided by DISCOMs shall attract GST liability. Recently, the Rajasthan High Court in the case of Jodhpur Vidyut Vitran Nigam Ltd.,[1] relying upon decision rendered by the Gujarat High Court in the case of Torrent Power Ltd.,[2] quashed the circular and held that such services are exempted from GST.
Let us analyse the precise issue and the reasoning given by the High Courts while quashing the circular.
At the outset, it is to be noted that the power to levy tax on the consumption or sale of electricity has been conferred to State Government vide S. No. 53 of List II of Seventh Schedule of the Constitution of India. For example, in Delhi, electricity tax is levied under the Delhi Municipal Corporation Act, 1957 and the DMC [Assessment and Collection of Tax on the Consumption, Sale or Supply of Electricity] Bye Laws, 1962.
Now, coming to provisions under GST law, supply of electrical energy has been exempted by Entry 104 of Notification No. 2/2017-Central Tax (Rate), dated 28 June 2017 (‘Goods Exemption Notification’). Further, supply of transmission or distribution of electricity by TRANSCOs/DISCOMs has been exempted by Entry 25 of Notification No. 12/2017-Central Tax (Rate), dated 28 June 2017 (‘Services Exemption Notification’).
It is a well settled by various case law that electricity qualifies to be goods[3]. Accordingly, supply of electrical energy has been exempted under Goods Exemption Notification. However, in addition to exempting electricity as goods, the government extended exemption to transmission and distribution services provided by TRANSCOs/DISCOMs.
Therefore, it is pertinent to understand as to what constitutes distribution of electricity services by DISCOMs.
We may mention that neither GST law nor Electricity Act, 2003 (‘Electricity Act’) defines distribution or distribution of electricity services. The Electricity Act though defines ‘distribution licensee’ to mean a licensee authorised to operate and maintain a distribution system for supplying electricity to the consumers in his area of supply. Further, ‘distribution system’ has been defined to mean the system of wires and associated facilities between the delivery points on the transmission lines or the generating station connection and the point of connection to the installation of the consumers.
We may also make a reference to Circular[4] issued in earlier regime which clarified that it is a general practice among TRANSCO/DISCOM to install electricity meters at the premises of the consumers, to measure the amount of electricity consumed by them and ‘hire charges’ are collected periodically. Supply of electricity meters for hire to the consumers being an essential activity having direct and close nexus with transmission and distribution of electricity, the same is covered by the exemption for transmission and distribution of electricity, extended under Notification No. 11/2010-ST, dated 27 February 2010 and/ or 32/2010-ST, dated 22 June 2010.
As a corollary to this, any activity having direct and close nexus with distribution of electricity, i.e. for sale of electricity should be exempted under distribution of electricity services. In other words, the activity of distribution of electricity is not a single activity but is rather a bundle of activities which collectively constitute distribution of electricity. Thus, charges for activities such as connection of electricity, rental charges of meter, meter testing fee, etc. being intrinsically linked to distribution of electricity should be covered under distribution services by DISCOMs.
However, CBIC issued a Circular[5] in 2018 stating that service by way of transmission or distribution of electricity by an electricity transmission or distribution utility is exempt from GST under Notification No. 12/2017-CT (R), Sl. No. 25. The other services such as,
provided by DISCOMS to consumer are taxable.
This naturally raises a doubt in the mind of taxpayers as to what makes the department shift its stand from the earlier circular issued in 2010.
The DISCOMs challenged the validity of the 2018 circular in light of proceedings initiated by department due to above circular. In the case of Torrent Power (supra), the Court struck down the 2018 circular as being ultra vires the provisions of Section 8 of the CGST Act (Composite and Mixed Supplies) as well as Notification No.12/2017-CT (R), Serial No.25, observing that the transmission and distribution of electricity cannot be done without the help of electric line, electric plant and electric meter, and nor can the related services be used for any purpose other than for transmission and distribution of electricity. Accordingly, where the services are naturally bundled in the ordinary course of business and the single service which gives such bundle its essential character is exempt from tax, the entire bundle will have to be treated as provision of such single service.
Relying upon above judgement, the Rajasthan High Court in the case of Jodhpur Vidyut Vitran Nigam Ltd. quashed Para 4(1) of the Circular dated 1 March 2018. The Court observed that simple reading of exemption notification leaves no room for ambiguity that entire package of services namely transmission or distribution of electricity has been exempted. Attempt of chipping out some of the services, out of the complete package and treating them to be taxable is not only arbitrary and unreasonable but such exercise is also violative of provisions of Section 8 of the CGST Act.
We may also discuss the backdrop in which the courts considered that services such as hiring of meter, connection fees, etc. are incidental to principal supply of distribution services. In authors’ view, the analogy drawn by the High Court appears to be incorrect to the extent the sale of electricity by DISCOMs has been assumed to be distribution services despite the fact that it qualifies as sale of electricity i.e. sale of goods and with that incorrect assumption, the specified services have been held to be incidental to principal supply of distribution services. It is also interesting to note that exemption entry for supply of electrical energy under Goods Exemption Notification was not highlighted before the Gujarat High Court either by the petitioner nor by the department.
But one may contend that such services are distribution services in themselves and the service exemption entry intended to cover only these services. Further, it can be contended that such services are incidental to supply of electrical energy, i.e. supply of goods by DISCOMs.
Further, the Court in the case of Torrent Power (supra) has relied upon Circular issued in 2010 which was in respect of exemption entry under service tax law. It can be contended that the scope of earlier exemption entry was wider in comparison to that of exemption entry under GST law. This is for the reason that Notification No. 11/2010-ST exempted any taxable service provided to any person, by a distribution licencee, a distribution franchisee, or any other person by whatever name called, authorized to distribute power under the Electricity Act, 2003 (36 of 2003), for distribution of electricity, from the whole of service tax. However, the present notification under GST law exempts distribution of electricity services by DISCOMs. But the same may be counter-argued stating that the distribution of electricity services can be equated with services provided to consumer for distribution of electricity and both exemption notifications intended to cover the same activities.
As it is said, tax complexity itself is a kind of tax, the same is true for distribution of electricity by DISCOMs. Despite the fact that their supplies were intended to be exempt from GST, absence of clear provisions and the approach of department of disputing tax on clearly intended exempted supplies has led to topsy-turvy for DISCOMs. The decision of Torrent Power (supra) has also been challenged by the department before the Supreme Court. The judiciary is expected to resolve the above issue and various other issues faced by this sector in respect of the exemption entries.
[The author is a Senior Associate in GST Advisory practice at Lakshmikumaran & Sridharan Attorneys, Gurgaon]