28 March 2024
From Customs and Foreign Trade Policy (‘FTP’) perspective, the duty exemption/ remission schemes and the ‘Make in India’ program are playing a vital role in globalization of the Indian trade. The objective of the Government should be to further strength these schemes by way of attractive tax exemptions, concessions, etc., complying with the WTO norms for increasing the exports and elevate India to the world's third-largest economy.
After industry had flagged certain concerns, the DGFT has stepped in extending the RoDTEP benefit to Advance Authorisation holders, Export Oriented Units and units in Special Economic Zone, and has relaxed the mandatory QCO compliance for import of inputs under Advance Authorisation and EOU meant for export.
The Interim Budget 2024 as anticipated did not make any significant changes in Customs law. The finance minister has announced that the same customs rates, including import duties, will be retained in the fiscal year 2024-25. Accordingly, no changes have been made in the basic rates of customs duties.
Relaxing mandatory QCO compliance for import of inputs under advance authorisation and by EOU and units in SEZ, meant for export
Import of various inputs into India are subjected to mandatory Quality Control Orders (QCOs) compliance under the BIS. Numerous QCOs on the other hand grant relaxation from its applicability on goods or articles meant for export.
There was a doubt as to whether inputs imported required for use in the manufacture of finished goods exported out of India would require compliance of BIS or not. It is given to understand that customs at various ports have been allowing inputs against Advance Authorization without insisting BIS compliance on the premise that such inputs would be used in export product. Thus, such inputs were/are getting exemption from registration which otherwise require BIS compulsory compliance.
Government vide Notification No. 71/2023 dated 11 March 2024 has now granted exemption from applicability of QCO, to imported inputs used in manufacture of export products.
Whether the relaxation / exemption granted vide Notification dated No. 71/2023 puts to rest the issue or it would open the pandora’s box?
Before analyzing the implication of the notification, we would first see the key observations of the notification:
The Notification therefore envisages the relaxation to those industries only, whose ministries fall under Appendix-2Y. In other words, the exemption is not applicable to all AA holders.
What will happen to other industries who import the inputs for manufacturing of finished goods against AA meant for exports. Therefore, the authors feel that the attempt to remove the ambiguity granting relaxation from applicability of QCO does not put to rest the issue, rather it could open pandora’s box for other industries.
One interesting aspect as to what could be the basis to cover three Ministries only, leaving all other industries from the exemption category is not clear.
Authors feel that notification seems requiring one to one co-relation between inputs imported vis-a-vis finished goods exported. Further, whether relaxation / exemption would be applicable for the existing AA or for new AA holder may be an issue especially in order to comply with pre-import condition.
Extending RoDTEP benefit to advance authorisation holders, Export Oriented Unit and Special Economic Zone
The objective of RoDTEP is to refund the currently un-refunded duties/taxes/levies, at the Central, State and local level, borne on the exported product, including prior stage cumulative indirect taxes on goods and services used in the production of the exported product and such indirect duties/ taxes/levies in respect of distribution of exported product.
The scheme of RoDTEP was implemented in August 2021. Rates for RoDTEP were notified with effect from 1 January 2022. AA holders, EOU, Special Economic Zones were kept out of the scheme. Notification No. 70/2023 dated 8 March 2024 now extends the RoDTEP benefit to AA holders, EOU, SEZ units.
It is observed that clause (x), which excluded AA holder, DFIA, Special Advance Authorisation holder, has been deleted, thereby covering in the inclusion of RoDTEP benefit. However, Sl. No. (vii) of Para 4.54 seems to extend benefit to AA/EOU/SEZ’s. It, however, does not include DFIA / Special Advance Authorisation holder etc. Thus, Authors feel that in absence of inclusion in Para 4.54, department may raise dispute in granting RoDTEP benefit to DFIA/ Special Advance Authorisation holder. Authors, therefore, feel that such an anomaly may be cured by the DGFT soon or industry may make suitable representation seeking inclusion of these categories as well to avoid unnecessary hassle/ dispute at later point in time.
As envisaged in the scheme, the objective of RoDTEP is to refund the un-refunded duties/taxes/levies, at the Central, State and local level, borne on the exported product. Such duties/ taxes etc. are incurred at equal footing either by exporter operating under AA scheme or otherwise. Thus, creating a separate Appendix for AA holder granting lower RoDTEP rates is desirable, or the same rate notified in Appendix-4R ought to have been granted to all.
Having said that, there is one more aspect of granting RoDTEP to MOOWR unit. Considering the objective of the scheme, i.e. to refund the un-refunded duties/taxes/levies, at the Central, State and local level, borne on the exported product, authors feel that the RoDTEP benefit ought to have been extended even to MOOWR unit as well especially when RoDTEP is not considered as incentive scheme contingent upon export performance.
India has signed an important trade agreement with the European Free Trade Association (EFTA), which consist of 4 countries - Switzerland, Norway, Iceland and Liechtenstein. The new Free Trade Agreement will promote duty-free import and export between India and those countries along with investments. It will be interesting to see the impact on trade with these countries.
[The authors are Partner and Principal Associate, respectively, in Customs practice at Lakshmikumaran & Sridharan Attorneys, Mumbai]